USPTO serial 79067558
SCHÄFER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELLINGER FATHY, JESSICA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCHÄFER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for the treating and the processing of metals, automatic conveyor belts and band-conveyors, machines for feeding and conducting and transmitting of workpieces in industrial handling processes and in installations for the treating and the processing of metals composed of the afore-mentioned goods, especially automatic presses and machines for feeding, respectively for driving of material or strip stocks, for example sheet metals in presses; machine tools and tools as parts of machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair of machines, machine tools and automatic installations for the treating and the processing of metals, especially presses; installation services and mounting with regard to the first assembly and putting in operation of machines, machine tools and automatic installations for the treating and the processing of metals, especially presses; mounting and installation services with regard to the modification of machines, machine tools and automatic installations for the treating and the processing of metals for purposes of modernisation, especially presses | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 24, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 18, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 18, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 18, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |