Drawing for HPO

USPTO serial 79067604

HPO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3896498Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 28, 2010
Examiner
CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with HPO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Duane M. Byers

Duane M. Byers NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.901 N GLEBE RDSTE 1100ARLINGTON, VA 22203-4184

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Development of chemical processes; development and design of chemical plants and installations; technical feasibility studies; upscaling of chemical processes, plants and installations, namely, consulting about development and design of chemical processes, plants and installations; consulting services in the field of design for capacity expansion of chemical plants and installations; acceptance tests and warranty tests of chemical processes, plants and installations, namely, testing to verify if chemical processes, plants and installations meet certain chemical processing and production requirements; consulting in the field of engineering; [ chemist services; chemistry consultation; consultation in the field of physics; medical laboratory services; chemical analysis; physical analysis of chemical processes, plants and installations; drawing up of expert reports by engineers, chemists or laboratory technicians; technical chemical research; planning in the field of building construction, namely, planning of buildings and chemical plants and installations being buildings; inspection of chemical plants and installations; technology consultation in the field of logistics; consultation in the fields of quality control, environmental science, and product safety testing; ] technical and legal research into issues pertaining to the protection of industrial property. [ providing information in the fields of environmental science and product safety testing; editing of written texts ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2022INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 24, 2022INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 24, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 10, 2022INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 10, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 15, 2021EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2021RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 11, 2021PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Feb 8, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 26, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 19, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 11, 2017EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 23, 2017PR75POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 71 & 15—
May 22, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 28, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 13, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 13, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Mar 28, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 24, 2011RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Dec 28, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 23, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 12, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 12, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 7, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 7, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 3, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 2, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 2, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 2, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 11, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 2, 2009DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 20, 2009DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Oct 16, 2009GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2009GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 9, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 9, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 4, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 15, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 18, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 15, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 15, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 8, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
May 7, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance