Drawing for DESEO

USPTO serial 79067607

DESEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3763429Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 23, 2010
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with DESEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLP1 Chase RoadLackenbach Siegel BuildingScarsdale, NY 10583-4156

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030biscuitsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 2, 2022RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Apr 10, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Apr 9, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 9, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Feb 20, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Feb 20, 2020ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS
Feb 20, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 25, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 2, 2015NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Nov 2, 2015C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Nov 2, 2015APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 20, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 5, 2012RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 12, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Jun 23, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 23, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 16, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 11, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 11, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 11, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 11, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 4, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 15, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 12, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 12, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 12, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 11, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 8, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
May 7, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance