Drawing for X DRYER

USPTO serial 79067665

X DRYER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3771776Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 6, 2010
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with X DRYER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq.

Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Industrial dryers and dehumidifiers for use in the cooling and temperature control of plastics materialsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 4, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 15, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Jul 13, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Jul 11, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 11, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 7, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 6, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 9, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 14, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 25, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 8, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 6, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 5, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 15, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 14, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance