USPTO serial 79067679
CASEPICK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CASEPICK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry L. Kelmachter
Barry L. Kelmachter Bachman & LaPointe, P.C.900 Chapel StreetSuite 1201New Haven, CT 06510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines in the field of conveyor technology for automated material handling, namely conveyors, conveyor belts, robots, articulated arm robots, gantry robots, and storage and retrieval machines, namely rail-bound cranes or shuttles; automated picking machinery for storage and order picking of consumer products; motors and engines except for land vehicles; machine coupling and transmission components except for land vehicles; conveyors, mechanical transport devices, namely belt conveyors, chain conveyors, vertical conveyors and lifting and/or lowering equipment; disposal installations comprising machines and mechanical apparatus for sorting, crushing and pressing the goods for disposal, and mechanical transport and conveyor belts for cardboard disposal | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 039 | Transporting materials by material handling equipment, namely conveyors and storage and retrieval machines; packaging and storage of goods, namely consumer goods, and food and beverage products, commissioning of goods for transport | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Scientific and technological services and research and design in the field of materials handling solutions; industrial analysis and research services in the field of materials handling solutions in the warehousing and distribution field; design and development of computer hardware and software; technical planning and development of materials handling solutions; technical consultancy in the field of conveyor installations and commission installations in the field of material handling solutions | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |