Drawing for FRESH WAY TRIPLE

USPTO serial 79067793

FRESH WAY TRIPLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRESH WAY TRIPLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumery; cosmetics; essential oils; toilet water; tissues impregnated with cosmetic lotions; oils for cleaning purposes; ethereal essences; polishing preparations and creams; scouring solutions; windscreen cleaning liquids; aromatics for automobilesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
005Deodorants, other than for personal use; deodorants for automobilesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Sep 27, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 30, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 15, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 23, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 1, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 14, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2009MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 23, 2009ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 27, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 23, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 14, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance