USPTO serial 79067800
ART PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3807168Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 22, 2010
- Examiner
- VALLILLO, MELISSA C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ART PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK I. PEROFF,
MARK I. PEROFF, HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLPSEVEN TIMES SQUARENEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Diagnostic imaging apparatus and appliances for dental, medical and veterinary use | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2019 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 18, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2018 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 27, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |