USPTO serial 79067806
SIMPASS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3889241Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2010
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMPASS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BEIJING WATCH DATA SYSTEM CO., LTD.
Beijing, CN
Other trademarks owned by BEIJING WATCH DATA SYSTEM CO., LTD.
BEIJING WATCH DATA SYSTEM CO., LTD.
CN
Other trademarks owned by BEIJING WATCH DATA SYSTEM CO., LTD.
BEIJING WATCH DATA SYSTEM CO., LTD.
CN
Other trademarks owned by BEIJING WATCH DATA SYSTEM CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nicholas D. Wells
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group, PLLC330 N. Main St.Kaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Data processing apparatus; recorded computer programs for use with smart cards in the fields of providing private and secure real time electronic communication, secure storage of data, data processing, USB key for online banking, IC card for public traffic, and contactless payments via mobile, wireless telephones and handheld electronic communicators; computer peripheral devices; recorded computer software for use with smart cards in the fields of providing private and secure real time electronic communication, secure storage of data, data processing, USB key for online banking, IC card for public traffic, and contactless payments via mobile, wireless telephones and handheld electronic communicators; encoded integrated circuit cards, namely, smart cards containing programming in the fields of providing private and secure real time electronic communication, secure storage of data, data processing, USB key for online banking, IC card for public traffic, and contactless payments via mobile, wireless telephones and handheld electronic communicators; downloadable electronic publications in the fields of smart cards and integrated circuits, namely, newsletters, pamphlets, manuals, product information sheets, and books; downloadable computer programs for use with smart cards in the fields of providing private and secure real time electronic communication, secure storage of data, data processing, USB key for online banking, IC card for public traffic, and contactless payments via mobile, wireless telephones and handheld electronic communicators | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BEIJING WATCH DATA SYSTEM CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by BEIJING WATCH DATA SYSTEM CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by BEIJING WATCH DATA SYSTEM CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SIMPASS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 1, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 21, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 20, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |