Drawing for FUGRO GEOTEAM

USPTO serial 79067837

FUGRO GEOTEAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3752515Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 23, 2010
Examiner
DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FUGRO GEOTEAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson

Jennifer Sheehan Anderson Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP39400 Woodward Avenue, Suite 101Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304-5151UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Oil exploration, gas exploration and oil prospecting services featuring geological seismic surveys and inspection of oil fields; scientific research, namely, analyzing seismic data; technical consultancy in the field of oil and gas exploration; engineering services; software developmentSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 15, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
May 30, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Apr 13, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 23, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 26, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 23, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 23, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 8, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 5, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 30, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 19, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 16, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 7, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 7, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 26, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 26, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 23, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 15, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
May 14, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance