USPTO serial 79067851
ALKORFOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3737205Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 12, 2010
- Examiner
- LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with ALKORFOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark J. Diliberti and Katherine P. Califa
Mark J. Diliberti and Katherine P. Califa Foley & Lardner LLP3000 K Street, N.W.Sixth FloorWashington, DC 20007Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Semi-processed plastics, namely, sheets and strips of plastic with or without adhesive bonding or optionally combined with other sheets or strips of natural or synthetic products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 1, 2011 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 14, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 12, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 20, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |