Drawing for CARUS

USPTO serial 79067861

CARUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3922098Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 22, 2011
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture, namely, conference chairsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2017DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Feb 2, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 2, 2016CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Mar 30, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 17, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 17, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 22, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 22, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 17, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 10, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 7, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 27, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 25, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 3, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 2, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 2, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 1, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 27, 2010GAUNNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2010GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Oct 27, 2010NAUDREPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED—
Oct 14, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 14, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 8, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 8, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 8, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 16, 2010GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Sep 16, 2010GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Sep 16, 2010CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 8, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 8, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 4, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 4, 2009GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2009GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 4, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 19, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 18, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 30, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 12, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 21, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 21, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 21, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 20, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 15, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 14, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance