Drawing for CERTESS

USPTO serial 79067920

CERTESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3784961Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 4, 2010
Examiner
WIENER, MICHAEL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CERTESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew J. Patch

Andrew J. Patch YOUNG & THOMPSON209 MADISON STREETSUITE 500ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Functional coating layers, hard coating layers and tribological coating layers, all composed of metallic nitrides, metallic carbides, metallic borides and/or carbon, and all for mechanical, electrical, electronic or optical parts and components or for decorative purposesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
006Entirely or principally metal sputtering targets of one or more non-ferrous metals or their alloys; non-ferrous metals and their metal alloys, all for sputtering targetsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Sep 6, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 28, 2019ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Sep 8, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Aug 15, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Aug 15, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Aug 9, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 9, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 6, 2015CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - POWER OF ATTORNEY ENTERED
Aug 6, 2015EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 18, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 18, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Aug 4, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 4, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 16, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Feb 16, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 9, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 17, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 1, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 1, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 1, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 1, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 1, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 31, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 22, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 22, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 21, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED
May 21, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance