USPTO serial 79067925
KETEL ONE CITROEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3787591Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2010
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with KETEL ONE CITROEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AN
AN
AN
NL
SCHIEDAM, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anna Kurian Shaw
Anna Kurian Shaw Hogan Lovells US LLP555 13th Street NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, vodka, gin, Dutch gin, distilled spirits, liquors [, rum, whiskey and brandy ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Double Eagle Brands N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Double Eagle Brands N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Double Eagle Brands N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Stichting DEB
- Other trademarks owned by Double Eagle Brands B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named KETEL ONE CITROEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2020 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 2, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 25, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 16, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 1, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 11, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 9, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |