USPTO serial 79067984
GLAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IMAM, AMEEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A. Cigelnik
PATRICIA A CIGELNIK1037 CONCORD CIRCLEMUNDELEIN, IL 60060UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Orthodontic brackets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Feb 19, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 16, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 5, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 1, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |