USPTO serial 79068003
HEYINOVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 12, 2011
- Examiner
- DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEYINOVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WILSON INSTRUMENTS (SHA) CO., LTD.
Shanghai, CN
Other trademarks owned by WILSON INSTRUMENTS (SHA) CO., LTD.
WILSON INSTRUMENTS (SHA); CO., LTD.
Shanghai, CN
Other trademarks owned by WILSON INSTRUMENTS (SHA); CO., LTD.
WILSON INSTRUMENTS (SHA); CO., LTD.
Shanghai, CN
Other trademarks owned by WILSON INSTRUMENTS (SHA); CO., LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
(Kenneth) Cang LI
(Kenneth) Cang LI Law Offices of (Kenneth) Cang LI1745 Broadway, 17 Fl.NEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus and instruments, namely, breast localization wires, surgical biopsy forceps, grasping forceps for foreign body retrieval in the gastrointestinal (GI) system, cytology brush for brushing off cells in the GI system, spray catheter, basket for retrieving foreign bodies in the GI system, flexible snare, namely, an endoscopic accessory for polypectomy in the GI system for use with a cautery unit, Sphincterotomes, hot biopsy forceps, bite block for protecting a patient's mouth, biopsy valve, body hearing aid, surgical skin stapler, electrocoagulator; Injectors for medical purposes, namely, insulin injectors sold empty, injection needles, namely, for removal of fluid and medicine injection; Dental apparatus, namely, drills, scaler for removing dental plaque, preventing periodontal disease and dental discoloring, cleaning brush for cleaning endoscope internal channel; Orthopaedic articles, namely, knee bandages, orthopedic joint implants in the nature of mechanical knee joints, and orthotic shoes for feet | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WILSON INSTRUMENTS (SHA) CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by WILSON INSTRUMENTS (SHA); CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by WILSON INSTRUMENTS (SHA); CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named HEYINOVO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Jul 12, 2020 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 3, 2017 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2011 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 28, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 27, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |