Drawing for TOUCH BIONICS

USPTO serial 79068135

TOUCH BIONICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3924824Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Mar 1, 2011
Examiner
BROWN, TINA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with TOUCH BIONICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves and Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200,San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Prosthetic passive external silicone body aesthetic restorations, body powered and myoelectric devices consisting primarily of prosthetic devices in the nature of [ prosthetic legs, ] prosthetic arms, prosthetic fingers, prosthetic feet, prosthetic toes, [ implants consisting of artificial materials and external prosthetic devices to enhance or replace body features in the nature of eyes, ears, noses attached to the body via prosthetic sockets, magnetic studs, osseointegrated connectors and other techniques used to fasten prosthetic limbs to the body, ] prosthetic sheaths, prosthetic socks and suspension sleeves for limbs; parts and fittings for use with the aforesaid goods, namely, control system software for controlling prosthetic limbs sold together as a unit with the prosthetic devices, wired and wireless interfaces and prosthetic componentry in the nature of medical electrodes, prosthetic coverings, namely, artificial skins and cushion liners for prosthetic limbs, sold together as a unit or separately for use with prosthetic devicesACTIVE—
044Fitting of prosthetic devices, [ implants and ] limbs; information, advisory and consultancy services relating to the fitting and use of prosthetic devices, prosthetic implants and prosthetic limbsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 2, 2022INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Nov 15, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Mar 15, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Feb 18, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 21, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 2, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 3, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 6, 2018INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Feb 9, 2018INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Feb 9, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Feb 5, 2018INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 5, 2017NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 201771AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
May 29, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 11, 2017ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 24, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 18, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 18, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jun 1, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 1, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 25, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 17, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 14, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 3, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 2, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 2, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 25, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 24, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2010OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 8, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 29, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Oct 29, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 27, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 27, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 27, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 1, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 30, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 24, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 24, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 24, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 10, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 10, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 10, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 2, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 28, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance