USPTO serial 79068169
GIRO D'ITALIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3841555Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 31, 2010
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIRO D'ITALIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey B. Sladkus,
Jeffrey B. Sladkus, Esq. The Sladkus Law Group1827 Powers Ferry RoadBuilding 6, Suite 200Atlanta, GA 30339Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | [ PRECIOUS METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS AND GOODS IN PRECIOUS METALS OR COATED THEREWITH, NAMELY, BOXES OF PRECIOUS METAL, BRACELETS OF PRECIOUS METAL, COMMEMORATIVE CUP SETS MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL, CUFFLINKS OF PRECIOUS METAL, CUPS OF PRECIOUS METAL, DECORATIVE BOXES MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL, DESKTOP SET REMADE IN PRECIOUS METAL, FANCY KEY-RINGS OF PRECIOUS METAL, FIGURES OF PRECIOUS METAL, IDENTITY PLATES OF PRECIOUS METAL, JEWEL CASES OF PRECIOUS METAL, KEY-HOLDERS OF PRECIOUS METALS, KEY-CHAINS OF PRECIOUS METAL, ORNAMENTAL PINS MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL, ORNAMENTS OF PRECIOUS METALS, PRECIOUS METALS IN GOLD, PRECIOUS METAL IN SILVER, PRECIOUS METALS IN PLATINUM PROCESSES OR SEMIPROCESSED METALS, SCULPTURES MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL, STATUES MADE OF PRECIOUS METAL, TIE-CLIPS OF PRECIOUS METAL, WORKS OF ART OF PRECIOUS METAL, ] JEWELRY [, PRECIOUS STONES; HOROLOGICAL AND CHRONOMETRIC INSTRUMENTS ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 26, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Mar 12, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 31, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 26, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 12, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2015 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 8, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 2, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 1, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |