USPTO serial 79068193
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd
Cwmbran, Gwent NP44 3XX, GB
Other trademarks owned by Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd
Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd
Cwmbran, Gwent NP44 3XX, GB
Other trademarks owned by Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Boris Umansky
Boris Umansky Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.180 N. StetsonSuite 4900Chicago, IL 60601| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Valves made wholly or principally of metal not being parts of machines; diaphragm valves made wholly or principally of metal not being parts of machines; structural parts for all the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
| 007 | Valves being parts of machines; power operated valves being parts of machines; pumps as parts of machines, motors and engines; hydraulic valve actuators; structural parts for the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | Electrical and electronic controllers for valves; electric actuators for valves; valves operated automatically by changes in physical conditions, namely, automatic valves; electrically and electronically controlled automatic valves; structural parts for the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | Valves made wholly or principally of plastic being other than machine parts; diaphragm valves made wholly or principally of plastic being other than machine parts; structural parts for the aforesaid goods | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 2, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2009 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 3, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |