Drawing for EXELON

USPTO serial 79068193

EXELON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRUCK, ROBERT J
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EXELON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Boris Umansky

Boris Umansky Leydig, Voit & Mayer, Ltd.180 N. StetsonSuite 4900Chicago, IL 60601

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Valves made wholly or principally of metal not being parts of machines; diaphragm valves made wholly or principally of metal not being parts of machines; structural parts for all the aforesaid goodsABANDONED—
007Valves being parts of machines; power operated valves being parts of machines; pumps as parts of machines, motors and engines; hydraulic valve actuators; structural parts for the aforesaid goodsABANDONED—
009Electrical and electronic controllers for valves; electric actuators for valves; valves operated automatically by changes in physical conditions, namely, automatic valves; electrically and electronically controlled automatic valves; structural parts for the aforesaid goodsABANDONED—
020Valves made wholly or principally of plastic being other than machine parts; diaphragm valves made wholly or principally of plastic being other than machine parts; structural parts for the aforesaid goodsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 7, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 7, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 19, 2010RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 9, 2010MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 9, 2010ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 9, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 9, 2010OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Feb 27, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 26, 2010OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Feb 26, 2010OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Feb 25, 2010OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 26, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 26, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 18, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 3, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 2, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 2, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2009RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 4, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 4, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 3, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 2, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 29, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 28, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance