USPTO serial 79068218
DIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 026 | Metal fasteners for shoes and boots; buttons for clothing; buttons; clothing hooks (fasteners); zip fasteners; clothing buckles; trouser clips for cyclists | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |