USPTO serial 79068239
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Abdominal belts; abdominal corsets; orthopedic supports, namely, lumbar belts, knee supports, ankle supports, elbow supports, shoulder braces, thigh supports, calf supports, and wrist supports; elastic, adhesive, and cohesive orthopedic bandages, trusses, and anatomical bandages for joints; medical compression stockings, tights, and socks | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, footwear, and headgear, namely, trousers, shirts, t-shirts, shorts, vests, tank tops, singlets, bathing suits, bodysuits, cycling shorts, pedal pushers, gloves, brassieres, tights, socks, stockings, spats, underpants, hats, and caps; sports shoes of all kinds, soles, and bath slippers; headbands | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Gymnastic and sporting articles, namely, boxing gloves and weight lifting belts; men's athletic supporters; machines for physical exercises; chest expanders; dumb-bells; protective padding for running, cycling, swimming, and playing tennis | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 10, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |