USPTO serial 79068288
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
botek Präzisionsbohrtechnik GmbH
Riederich, DE
botek Präzisions-Bohrtechnik GmbH
Riederich, DE
botek Präzisions-Bohrtechnik GmbH
Riederich, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
Stewart J. Bellus Collard & Roe, P.C.1077 Northern Blvd.Roslyn, NY 11576UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools and hard metal machine tools, namely, cutting tools, namely, milling cutters, angle cutters, endmills, power drilling tools, namely, electric drills, single flute gundrills, twin flute gundrills, pilot drills, stepped pilot drills, twist drills, stepped twist drills, drill tubes, drill tube drivers, drill bushings, carbide twist drills, stepped drills, drill heads in the nature of power drill bits for deep hole drilling which have indexable inserts and guide pads for solid drilling, guiding pieces sold as an integral component of the drilling tools, vibration dampers used in connection with drilling tools and sold as a unit; coolant supply units used in connection with drilling tools and sold as a unit; setting gauges used in connection with drilling tools and sold as a unit; power deep-hole drilling tools, namely, drilling machines, counterboring drills and tools, counterboring heads, pull boring heads, counterboring head multi-cutters, all sold as an integral unit of the drilling tools; special drilling tools, namely, trepanning tools in the nature of deep hole drilling tools with indexable inserts and guide pads for trepanning and solid drilling and reduced power consumption, trepanning gundrills, carbide drills, tap removing drills, tap size drills, Numerical Control spot drills, engraving tools, endmills, all sold as integral components of the special drilling tools; full hole drilling tools, namely, full hole drilling machines, boring tools, namely, boring machines, core-drilling tools, namely, core-drilling machines, milling tools, namely, milling-drilling machines, grinding tools for grinding machines, tool grinding machines, machine tools, namely, axial pulsators, clamping cones, drill bush holders, whipguide bushings, sealing discs, drilling machines, deep-hole drilling machines, special drilling machines, namely, full hole drilling machines, boring machines, core-drilling machines, milling machines, and all aforementioned goods not hand-operated, and structural parts for the aforementioned goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repairs of metalworking tools; rental of hand and power tools and machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering consultancy in the field of drilling tools and machines | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 29, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 27, 2010 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 10, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |