Drawing for MTC

USPTO serial 79068330

MTC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3737217Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 12, 2010
Examiner
GARDNER, DAWNA BERYL
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MTC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norm J. Rich

Norm J. Rich Foley & Lardner LLP3000 K Street, N.W.Sixth FloorWashington, DC 20007-5109

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Valves and heat exchangers all being parts of motors for motor vehicles; vehicle engine parts, namely, exhaust gas coolers; engine parts for motor vehicles, namely, modules consisting primarily of valve and heat exchanger and exhaust gas coolerSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
011Air cooling apparatus; heat exchangers not being parts of machines; evaporative air cooling units for domestic use consisting primarily of valve and heat exchangers for coolingSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Oct 18, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jun 16, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 2, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Apr 19, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Aug 19, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 17, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 13, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 27, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 7, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 25, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 24, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 23, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 14, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 10, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 9, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 5, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance