Drawing for SERVANT

USPTO serial 79068341

SERVANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SERVANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, footwear, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Nov 1, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 11, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 12, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 21, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 21, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 4, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 4, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 21, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 21, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 20, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 20, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 20, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jan 19, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Jan 18, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Jan 18, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Jul 24, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 22, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 22, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 22, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 18, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 9, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 5, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 4, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance