USPTO serial 79068396
AURIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3850162Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2010
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AURIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Sloane
Peter S. Sloane LEASON ELLIS LLPONE BARKER AVENUE, FIFTH FLOORWHITE PLAINS, NY 10601-1526UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | non-metal cladding for construction and building; non-metal shingles | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eternit Österreich GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Eternit-Werke Ludwig Hatschek; Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Eternit-Werke Ludwig Hatschek; Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named AURIA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 2, 2021 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 21, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | NA75 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | C75A | REGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 31, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2016 | ES75 | TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 13, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 18, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |