Drawing for NOKIAN TYRES

USPTO serial 79068432

NOKIAN TYRES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3781343Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 27, 2010
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NOKIAN TYRES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott S. Havlick

Scott S. Havlick Holland & Hart LLPP.O. Box 8749Attn: Trademark DocketingDenver, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012TiresACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 12, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 27, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Aug 30, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 13, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 13, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 13, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 13, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2015REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2013LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jun 17, 2013LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 11, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 11, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 11, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2011NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 27, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 27, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 20, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 4, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 29, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 29, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 17, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 27, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 12, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 11, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 5, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 5, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance