USPTO serial 79068460
DRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Implant materials and tissue substitutes, namely, dental implants; goods of metal for medical use, namely, screw implants; lateral dental implants; basal osseointegration implants, artificial bones for implantation, synthetic filler and extender material to serve as replacement for bone, prosthetic bone for facial and dental use for human and animal bodies; materials, namely, dental bridges, crowns and caps; prosthetic teeth; goods of metal for medical use, namely, external fixation plates and rods; bone prostheses for bone implants; bone repair compound for use in orthopedic surgery, for replacing human or animal tissue; artificial implants for human medicine; prosthetic superstructures, namely, bone prostheses; prosthetic items, namely, apparatus and instruments for surgical and dental purposes and for use in dental laboratories; surgical and dental tools, namely, picks, burrs, splints, compressors, and instruments and tools for implants and prostheses for surgical and dental purposes; mechanically driven surgical instruments, namely, wrenches, surgical drills, electric scalpels, membranes used for covering bone defects, namely, bone screws and nails used for fastening such membranes to bone; suitcases, bags and containers specially adapted for holding surgical and dental instruments, particularly for storage and sterilization | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | User manuals for use with data processing apparatus, for computers, computer peripheral devices, scanners and computer software | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Biomed Est.
- Other trademarks owned by Biomed Est.
- Other trademarks owned by Dr. Ihde Dental AG
- Other trademarks owned by Biomed Est.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named DRIVE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 26, 2013 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2011 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2011 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 11, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Nov 27, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2010 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 3, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 15, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 13, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |