Drawing for LUXURY

USPTO serial 79068569

LUXURY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUXURY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Washstands and shower trays, made of glass and treated crystal, for bathrooms, kitchens and other premises inside buildings and to be used outside buildingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
019Coating for parterres and for walls of glass and treated crystal, intended be used on the inside and outside of buildingsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
020Dressing tables and table tops, made of glass and treated crystal, used as furnitureSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 16, 2019UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 13, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Jul 12, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 21, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Feb 2, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Feb 2, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 11, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 11, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 3, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 24, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 16, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 16, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 16, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 16, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 15, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance