Drawing for NITTAN

USPTO serial 79068618

NITTAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3793260Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 25, 2010
Examiner
SPILS, CAROL A
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NITTAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta PROCOPIO, CORY, HARGREAVES & SAVITCH LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200,SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electric buzzers; telecommunication devices and apparatus, namely, telecommunication exchangers and telecommunication switches; computer programs for editing images, sound and video; computer software for use in database management, use as a spreadsheet, and word processing, in connection with fire alarm apparatus and fire alarm installations; fire extinguishers; fire extinguishing apparatus; fire hydrants; fire alarms; fire detectors; gas alarmsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 5, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 27, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 25, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
May 4, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
May 4, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 4, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Mar 17, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 28, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Dec 3, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 7, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 7, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 25, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 25, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 9, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 2, 2009CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Jun 25, 2009CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 24, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 23, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 22, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 17, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 16, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance