USPTO serial 79068843
DURAPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3889250Status 706Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2010
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with DURAPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel E. Kattman
Daniel E. Kattman Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren s.c.1000 N. Water Street; Suite 2100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | High-end door fittings of metal; window fittings of metal; [ furniture fittings of metal; ] metal door knobs; metal door handles; metal window handles; metal door plates for door handles; metal push-pull plates; metal door kick plates; metal rosettes for door and window handles; door hardware, namely, keys and key cylinders, not electric; metal striking plates for doors and locks; metal door latches; metal window latches; metal hinge plates; metal hinges; metal door stops; metal door knockers; non-electric metal door chimes; non luminous metal house numbers; metal mailboxes; metal mail slots; [ metal hooks; metal clothes hooks, ] metal garment name plates; metal decorative nails; * all of the aforesaid goods not being for use in furniture * | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | [ High-end door fittings, not of metal; window fittings, not of metal; [ furniture fittings, not of metal; ] door knobs, not of metal, namely, of wood or plastic; door handles, not of metal; window handles, not of metal; non-metal door plates for door handles; non-metallic push pull plates; non-metallic door kick plates; non-metallic rosettes for door and window handles; non-metallic door hardware, namely, keys and key cylinders, not electric non-metallic door latches; non-metallic window latches; non-metallic door hinge plates; non-metallic hinges; non luminous non-metallic house numbers; non-metallic mailboxes, non-metallic mail slots not of masonry; [ non-metallic wardrobe hooks, non-metallic garment hooks; ] non-metal newspaper holders; non-metallic signboards, namely, of wood or plastic; * all the aforesaid goods not being for use in furniture * ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2021 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2021 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jun 3, 2017 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2017 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 25, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2013 | INNA | INVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 14, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2011 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |