Drawing for KANGA BOY

USPTO serial 79068895

KANGA BOY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KANGA BOY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025T-shirts; singlets; vests; baseball caps and hats; swim suits; sweat bands; shorts; baby bibs not of paper; Baby bodysuits; Baby tops; Beachwear; Beanies; Board shorts; Boxer briefs; Boxer shorts; Briefs underwear; Children's and infant's apparel, namely, jumpers, overall sleepwear, pajamas, rompers and one-piece garments; Children's headwear; Cloth diapers; Flip flops footwear; Footwear for men and women; Gloves; Gym shorts; Hooded sweat shirts; Jackets and socks; Men's underwear; Muscle tops; Shorts; Socks; Swim wearABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 14, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 13, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 4, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 16, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 15, 2011MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 15, 2011ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 15, 2011OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 15, 2011OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 15, 2011RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 21, 2010OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 20, 2010OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2010OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Dec 4, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 18, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 18, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 2, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 17, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 17, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 7, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 22, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2010CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 22, 2010CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Mar 22, 2010CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 19, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 19, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 19, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 15, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 11, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 11, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 11, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 11, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 19, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance