USPTO serial 79068924
MCGREGOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4243949Status 709
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2012
- Examiner
- PEREZ, STEVEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MCGREGOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-5033 BUCHS (AG), CH
CH-5033 BUCHS (AG), CH
CH-5033 BUCHS (AG), CH
NL
McGregor Finance International B.V.
NL
Other trademarks owned by McGregor Finance International B.V.
McGregor Finance International B.V.
NL-3971 KA DRIEBERGEN-RIJSENBURG, NL
Other trademarks owned by McGregor Finance International B.V.
NL-3971 KA DRIEBERGEN RYSENBURG, NL
NL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitation leather, goods made of these materials, namely, bags, trunks and suitcases, wallets, purses, umbrellas, handbags, beach bags, travel bags | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing namely, bath robes, bathing trunks, beach clothes, namely bathing suits, beach coverups; belts, blazers, suspenders, clothing of leather, namely jackets, skirts, pants, dresses; coats, collars, cuffs, dress pants, gloves, jackets, coats, jerseys, knitwear namely knit dresses, knit blazers, knit polo shirts, knit pullovers, knit rugby shirts, knit scarves, knit shirts, knit shorts, knit socks, knit sweaters, knit t-shirts, knit ties, knit underwear, knit vests, knit headwear, outerclothing, namely body warmers in the nature of vests; overcoats, pants, trousers, parkas, polo coat, polo shirts, pullovers, robes, rugby shirts, scarf, scarves, shawls, shirts, long sleeve shirts, short sleeves shirts, shorts, socks, stuff jacket, suits, sweaters, swimming trunks, swim-shorts, swim-suits, swim-wear, tee shirts, ties, topcoats, trunks, t-shirts, underwear, vests, waistcoats, wristbands; headwear, namely caps, peaks; boots, shoes and slippers, beach shoes, lace boots, sandals | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MFG Licensing GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by MFG Licensing GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by MFG Licensing GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by McGregor IP B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by McGregor Finance International B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by McGregor Finance International B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by McGregor Finance B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Doniger Fashion Group B.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MCGREGOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2021 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2020 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 14, 2020 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 14, 2020 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 21, 2020 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 21, 2019 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Mar 15, 2018 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Feb 15, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2017 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 17, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2013 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 20, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 7, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2012 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 2, 2010 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 12, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |