Drawing for UN MATIN D'ORAGE

USPTO serial 79068961

UN MATIN D'ORAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3734496Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 5, 2010
Examiner
LUKEN, BONNIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with UN MATIN D'ORAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes, eaux de toilette, cosmeticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 28, 2025CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Aug 21, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 7, 2024CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
May 7, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 17, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 23, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 6, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 5, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 27, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 28, 2015ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 30, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 2, 2010FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 11, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 6, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 5, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 20, 2009NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 20, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 10, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 2, 2009CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 30, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 30, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance