Drawing for PERFECT SPRAY

USPTO serial 79068990

PERFECT SPRAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3787613Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 11, 2010
Examiner
LOWRY, LEIGH A
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFECT SPRAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cathleen F. Baraloto

Cathleen F. Baraloto Faegre & Benson LLP90 South Seventh Street2200 Wells Fargo CenterMinneapolis, MN 55402-3901

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for the manufacture of paints; waterproofing chemicals for masonry and for cement; preservatives for roof tiles, bricks and masonry; cement preservativesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
002Aluminum paints; paints; asbestos paints; resin-based, water-based, and elastomeric-based coatings for roofing felt; thickeners for paints; refractory paints, paints and dyes; primers; paints being wood preservatives; wood stains; indigo; ceramic paints; colorants, namely, cobalt oxide; pigments, namely, carbon black; pigments, namely, Orleans; distempers; thinners for paints; pigments, namely, zinc oxide; coatings being paintsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
007Paint application machines; powered spray guns for paint, in particular airbrush guns; powered paint-mixing apparatus and parts therefor; mixing machines for paintsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Aug 23, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 15, 2017INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 18, 2017INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 18, 2017INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 16, 2017INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 16, 2016C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Mar 22, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 3, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 3, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Aug 11, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 11, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 23, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 23, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 10, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 30, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 30, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 30, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 30, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 29, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance