Drawing for NIGHT RACER

USPTO serial 79069042

NIGHT RACER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3737228Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 12, 2010
Examiner
STEIN, JAMES W
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with NIGHT RACER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Curtis Krechevsky

Curtis Krechevsky Cantor Colburn LLP20 Church Street22nd FloorHartford, CT 06103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Electric lamps and luminaires, adapted for use as motorcycle headlights, and component parts of the aforementioned goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 9, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
May 2, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2025ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jan 23, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Mar 18, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 8, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Sep 9, 2019ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 23, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jan 12, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 29, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 11, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2014CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jul 31, 2014CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Feb 21, 2014ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 30, 2013ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 7, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Oct 14, 2011ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
May 17, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 17, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 13, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 12, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 27, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 7, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 24, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 24, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 24, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 17, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 12, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Aug 12, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Aug 12, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Aug 11, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 26, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance