Drawing for BLUEANT SIMPLY CONNECT

USPTO serial 79069046

BLUEANT SIMPLY CONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3950002Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 26, 2011
Examiner
LOOK, JEFFREY J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUEANT SIMPLY CONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karl F. Kenna

Karl F. Kenna Fliesler Meyer LLP650 California Street14th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94108

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Telecommunication equipment, namely, apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; instruments for data communication and telecommunication, namely, devices for transporting and aggregating voice communications across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols; telephone apparatus; telephone receivers; telephone transmitters; headsets for telephones, loud speakers for telephones, ear pieces for telephones, microphones for telecommunications apparatus, and parts and accessories for the foregoing goods sold as a unit with the goods; computer peripheralsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2019UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Nov 15, 2019DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 15, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 14, 2018INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Aug 7, 2018INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 7, 2018INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 1, 2018INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 1, 2017C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Feb 24, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 19, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 19, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Jul 26, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 26, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 28, 2011OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 13, 2011OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 13, 2011OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 6, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 16, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 11, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 29, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 29, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 25, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 10, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2010ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 7, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 6, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2010RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 4, 2009CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 3, 2009CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 2, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 2, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 28, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 24, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 15, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 15, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 14, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance