Drawing for BALLIN

USPTO serial 79069051

BALLIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3910278Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 25, 2011
Examiner
HAMPTON, CHARISMA
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BALLIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

R. Peter Spies

R. Peter Spies DTL Ltd.160 North Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018All-purpose carrying bags in leather, animal skin and imitation leather, namely, fashion handbags, sport bags, backpacks, book bags, briefcases; travel bags and bags for carrying shoes; suitcases and trunks; belt bags, bumbags; wallets, keycases and leather shoulder belts; furs; umbrellasACTIVE—
025Footwear for [ men, ] women [ and children, ], namely, shoes, boots, moccasins, athletic shoes, sabots, sandals, slippers; headgear, namely, [ caps, hats and ] foulardsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 7, 2025CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 13, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Aug 9, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2022INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 2, 2022INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
May 2, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Dec 22, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Feb 18, 2021NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 202171AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jan 20, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2020REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
May 30, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jun 5, 2017NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jun 5, 2017C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
May 31, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 13, 2017ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2012CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 13, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 13, 2011FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Apr 25, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2011R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 11, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 25, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 9, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 9, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2010GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2010GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 30, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 8, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 19, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2010GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 1, 2010GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Jul 1, 2010CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Jun 28, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 28, 2010JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 28, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2010ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2009GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 28, 2009GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 28, 2009CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 3, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 28, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 28, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 28, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 27, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance