Drawing for PRO SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 79069157

PRO SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3803349Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 15, 2010
Examiner
DELGIZZI, RONALD ERNEST
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with PRO SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Leonard

Michael J. Leonard Fox Rothschild LLP997 Lenox Drive, Bldg. 3Lawrenceville, NJ 08648-2311UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Yarns of aramid fibers not for textile use; yarns of unidirectional aramid fibers for use in conjunction with thermoplastic or thermosetting resins for protection shields and general industrial applications; prefabricated shields and laminated plates composed of aramid fibers, rubber, gutta-percha, gum, and mica coated with different resin types or with rubber, for use in manufacturing ballistic, explosive, and fire repellant and protective clothing, systems, panels, and plates for hard armoring, building and vehicle armoringACTIVE—
023Yarns and threads, for textile useACTIVE—
024Ballistic resistant fabric for use in the production of bulletproof and blast proof clothing, shoes, and bulletproof and blast proof garments and shields; fabric reinforced with aramid fibers for use in land, sea, and aerospace applications, namely for soft and hard structures as shields and panels for blast and ballistic protection, for stab and spike protection, for blunt trauma reduction; unidirectional multiaxial fabrics, flame resistant fabrics and fabric for advanced and industrial composites, namely parts of vehicles, structural panelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Sep 1, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 3, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Jan 4, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Jul 28, 2016NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2016C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jul 25, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jun 15, 2016ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2010FINVFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 20, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 20, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 15, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 30, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 7, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 7, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 7, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 7, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 7, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 6, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 29, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance