Drawing for PINGO

USPTO serial 79069214

PINGO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PINGO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals for de-icing, chemicals for protection against freezing, products for conserving lacquersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
002Anti-corrosive preparationsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
003Products for cleaning and preserving chrome, chemicals for removing rust, chemicals for removing tar (not applicable to the human body), products for cleaning plastic objects (except for dental prostheses and contact lenses), chemical goods for cleaning cold engines, products for cleaning and polishing motor cars (except for leather), wax for polishing lacquers, especially lacquers for motor carsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2013DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Feb 19, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 31, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 28, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 10, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 25, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Nov 25, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 28, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 28, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 18, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 1, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 1, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 1, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 30, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jun 26, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 26, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jun 25, 2009SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance