USPTO serial 79069227
W'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3742687Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 26, 2010
- Examiner
- KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with W'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL
G. FRANKLIN ROTHWELL ROTHWELL, FIGG, ERNST & MANBECK, PC1425 K STREET NWSUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2019 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 9, 2017 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 9, 2017 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 2, 2017 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 2, 2016 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Aug 14, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2010 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2010 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 21, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |