USPTO serial 79069228
ICEBERG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3853734Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2010
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICEBERG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DE
SULO Eisenwerk Streuber & Lohmann GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by SULO Eisenwerk Streuber & Lohmann GmbH
SULO Eisenwerk Streuber & Lohmann GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by SULO Eisenwerk Streuber & Lohmann GmbH
SULO Eisenwerk Streuber & Lohmann GmbH
DE
Other trademarks owned by SULO Eisenwerk Streuber & Lohmann GmbH
FR
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Large industrial-sized metal containers for waste and metal containers for recyclable materials for commercial, industrial or public use, especially mobile or fixed, particularly for inground installations | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 020 | Large industrial-sized plastic containers for waste and plastic containers for recyclable materials for commercial, industrial or public use, especially mobile or fixed, particularly for inground installations | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sulo Umwelttechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SULO Eisenwerk Streuber & Lohmann GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SULO Eisenwerk Streuber & Lohmann GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by SULO Eisenwerk Streuber & Lohmann GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by COMPAGNIE PLASTIC OMNIUM
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named ICEBERG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2019 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 23, 2018 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2018 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 20, 2018 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2011 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 13, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 10, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 11, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |