USPTO serial 79069326
SONARBELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SONARBELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William H. Brewster
WILLIAM H. BREWSTER KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP1100 PEACHTREE STREET NESUITE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Nautical surveying apparatus for marking underwater objects and locations, reflecting acoustic signals, and providing relative position and directional information under water | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 17, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2010 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 7, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |