USPTO serial 79069331
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Artificial turfs, in particular comprising layers of man-made synthetic fibers, filaments and particulate infill, in particular for the playing of soccer, american football, lacrosse, field hockey, cricket, golf and other athletic activities and outdoor | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 031 | Natural turf for sports grounds; natural turf for sports activities and outdoor | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation of synthetic grass systems for the playing of soccer, American football, lacrosse, field hockey, cricket, golf and other athletic activities and outdoor | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 044 | Advisory services relating to the use of garden and horticultural products and the selection, propagation and growth of lawns, turf, plants, shrubs, trees, vegetables, soft fruit and fruit trees | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 17, 2019 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 3, 2010 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |