USPTO serial 79069334
MIMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3899300Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 4, 2011
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cereal Investments Company; (C.I.C.) S.A.
CH
Other trademarks owned by Cereal Investments Company; (C.I.C.) S.A.
Cereal Investments Company; (C.I.C.) S.A.
CH
Other trademarks owned by Cereal Investments Company; (C.I.C.) S.A.
Cereal Investments Company; (C.I.C.) S.A.
CH
Other trademarks owned by Cereal Investments Company; (C.I.C.) S.A.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Galbreath
John A. Galbreath Galbreath Law Offices, P.C.2516 Chestnut Woods Ct.Reisterstown, MD 21136UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cereal Investments Company; (C.I.C.) S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Cereal Investments Company; (C.I.C.) S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Cereal Investments Company; (C.I.C.) S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MIMO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2025 | Further Decision Processed by IB | — | |
| Nov 19, 2025 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 19, 2025 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 3, 2018 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 5, 2017 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 18, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2009 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2009 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |