USPTO serial 79069475
EGO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3918927Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 15, 2011
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EGO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD M. GOLDBERG
RICHARD M. GOLDBERG GOLDBERG PATENT LAW OFFICE25 EAST SALEM STREETSUITE 419HACKENSACK, NJ 07601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Ornamental articles made of glass, namely, glasses, cups, jugs, bowls, dishes, serving dishes, pots, soup bowls, carafes, mugs and basins; glass centerpieces, glass items for household and kitchen use, namely, glasses, cups, jugs, bowls, dishes, serving dishes, pots, carafes, mugs and basins, glass works of art, products made of glass not included in other classes, namely, glass candlesticks, glass flowerpots, glass pots, glass containers, glass containers for candles, glass tableware, namely, glasses, cups, jugs, bowls, dishes, serving dishes, pots, soup bowls, carafes, mugs and basins; enameled glass, namely, glasses, cups, jugs, bowls, dishes, serving dishes, pots, soup bowls, carafes, mugs and basins; glass beads not used in the manufacture of jewelry; glass house ware, namely, glasses, cups, jugs, bowls, dishes, serving dishes, pots, soup bowls, carafes, mugs and basins; glass ornaments, flowerpots made of glass, glass vials and flasks sold empty; boxes made of glass, tea and coffee sets made of glass; kitchen utensils of glass, namely, glasses, cups, jugs, bowls, dishes, serving dishes, pots, soup bowls, carafes, mugs and basins; fruit cups, covers for dishes and pot lids | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2018 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 5, 2013 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2011 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| May 15, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |