Drawing for XTENDER

USPTO serial 79069505

XTENDER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3750090Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 16, 2010
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with XTENDER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen R. Baird

Stephen R. Baird Greenberg Traurig, LLP90 South Seventh Street, Suite 3500Minneapolis, MN 55402United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Alarm monitoring systems [ ; instruments, electrical devices, apparatus, namely, video cameras for monitoring, remote monitoring and video monitoring for use with transmission of messages, sounds and images via telephone and telecommunications networks including global or with private or reserved access; alarm installations and alarms which includes capability to transmit messages, sounds and images via telephone and telecommunications networks including global or with private or reserved access; alarm monitoring systems using bidirectional and encrypted radio links; electronic video sensors and motion detectors with or without night vision; video cameras, digital cameras, cameras with built-in motion detectors; video disc players; camera control keypads; remote controls for alarm systems; apparatus and instruments for recording, transmitting, storing, reproducing, converting and receiving analog or digital data and signals particularly for reproducing voice, sound, text or images via radio relay, cable or wire, fiber-optics or electromagnetic radiation ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2025EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Nov 24, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2025EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2025CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2025COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2021INNAINVALIDATION REVIEWED - NO ACTION REQUIRED BY OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2021INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 10, 2020NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 202071AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Dec 7, 2020APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 17, 2020ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2019RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Feb 16, 2019REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2019NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2017INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
May 3, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2017XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2017XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Feb 20, 2017INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Jun 20, 2016NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 201671AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED—
Jun 17, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 7, 2016EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2016PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71—
Mar 15, 2016APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 13, 2016ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2013FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 5, 2012ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jun 8, 2010FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 8, 2010FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
May 17, 2010FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 16, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 1, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 6, 2009ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Oct 29, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 13, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 12, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 6, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 14, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 13, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 13, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 11, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 10, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 10, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2009LIMSLIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance