USPTO serial 79069523
AURORA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3892617Status 780Registered
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 21, 2010
- Examiner
- SHARMA, NAPOLEON
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.
Need help with AURORA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Russian Standard Intellectual Property Holding AG
Huenenberg, CH
Other trademarks owned by Russian Standard Intellectual Property Holding AG
Closed joint-stock company with 100 per cent foreign investments "ROUST INCORPORATED"
RU-196140 Saint-Peterburg, RU
Closed joint-stock company with 100 per cent foreign investments "ROUST INCORPORATED"
RU-196140 Saint-Peterburg, RU
Closed joint-stock company with 100 per cent foreign investments "ROUST INCORPORATED"
RU-196140 Saint-Peterburg, RU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MAXIM A VOLTCHENKO
MAXIM A VOLTCHENKO KAPLAN BREYER SCHWARZ LLP90 MATAWAN ROADSUITE 201MATAWAN, NJ 07747Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Vodka | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Russian Standard Intellectual Property Holding AG
- Other trademarks owned by Closed joint-stock company with 100 per cent foreign investments "ROUST INCORPORATED"
- Other trademarks owned by Closed joint-stock company with 100 per cent foreign investments "ROUST INCORPORATED"
- Other trademarks owned by Closed joint-stock company with 100 per cent foreign investments "ROUST INCORPORATED"
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named AURORA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2021 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 13, 2020 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2020 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| May 2, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 27, 2020 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2019 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2019 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2019 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2017 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 6, 2011 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 15, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2010 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 12, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 13, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 19, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |