Drawing for CRYSTAL

USPTO serial 79069581

CRYSTAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KIDWELL WALKER, JACLYN NOEMI
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRYSTAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical hearing aids and parts of such devicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Nov 29, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Mar 3, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Jul 10, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2012FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 16, 2012FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2012FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 16, 2011MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 16, 2011ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 16, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 1, 2011EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 25, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2010EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 15, 2010EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 15, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 12, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 22, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 22, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 22, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 21, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 10, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance