USPTO serial 79069591
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Julie B. Seyler
JULIE B. SEYLER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automotive engine blocks; fuel injectors for internal combustion engines; igniting magnetos for engines; Engine parts, namely, electronic fuel injection modules and fuel injectors; Motors and engines except for land vehicles; fuel economizer for motor or engine, namely, enhancement parts for internal combustion engines, namely, fuel catalysts; Fuel ignition apparatus for internal combustion engines, namely, ignition wires and ignition devices for motors of land vehicles; fuel injection apparatus and devices for internal combustion engines, namely, fuel injectors; fuel/air ratio controls as parts of engines or motors, namely, electronic fuel injection modules; igniting and ignition devices and apparatus for internal combustion engines, namely, condensors, coils, distributor caps, distributor rotors and ignition wires; mechanical devices for checking and controlling injectors for engines, namely, carburetors and power valves for carburetors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Automobile electric batteries; ignition batteries; computer peripheral devices; electric ignition coils for liquid fuel burning equipment into internal combustion engine; automotive performance testing and internal combustion engine testing apparatus, namely, voltmeters; electric ignition apparatus for liquid fuel burning equipment, namely, electric igniters used in connection with ballasts to start discharge lamps; protective circuits for the ignition systems of engines, namely, fuses and circuit breakers; Electronic controls for motors and engines and for measuring the quantity of fuel injected into engines for automated control thereof | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2019 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 13, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| May 4, 2013 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2011 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 25, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 18, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |