Drawing for ELDOR

USPTO serial 79069591

ELDOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELDOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Julie B. Seyler

JULIE B. SEYLER ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 THIRD AVENUENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Automotive engine blocks; fuel injectors for internal combustion engines; igniting magnetos for engines; Engine parts, namely, electronic fuel injection modules and fuel injectors; Motors and engines except for land vehicles; fuel economizer for motor or engine, namely, enhancement parts for internal combustion engines, namely, fuel catalysts; Fuel ignition apparatus for internal combustion engines, namely, ignition wires and ignition devices for motors of land vehicles; fuel injection apparatus and devices for internal combustion engines, namely, fuel injectors; fuel/air ratio controls as parts of engines or motors, namely, electronic fuel injection modules; igniting and ignition devices and apparatus for internal combustion engines, namely, condensors, coils, distributor caps, distributor rotors and ignition wires; mechanical devices for checking and controlling injectors for engines, namely, carburetors and power valves for carburetorsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
009Automobile electric batteries; ignition batteries; computer peripheral devices; electric ignition coils for liquid fuel burning equipment into internal combustion engine; automotive performance testing and internal combustion engine testing apparatus, namely, voltmeters; electric ignition apparatus for liquid fuel burning equipment, namely, electric igniters used in connection with ballasts to start discharge lamps; protective circuits for the ignition systems of engines, namely, fuses and circuit breakers; Electronic controls for motors and engines and for measuring the quantity of fuel injected into engines for automated control thereofSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Oct 25, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 13, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Dec 1, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 4, 2013NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 27, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 11, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 11, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 25, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 9, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 9, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 11, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Aug 11, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Aug 10, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Feb 18, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Feb 18, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 18, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jan 26, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 26, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 15, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 11, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 20, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 20, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 18, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 17, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 10, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 10, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 9, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance