USPTO serial 79069627
SBG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4519609Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 29, 2014
- Examiner
- CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SBG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITEED
Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA
Other trademarks owned by THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITEED
THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA; LIMITED
ZA
Other trademarks owned by THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA; LIMITED
THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA; LIMITED
ZA
Other trademarks owned by THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA; LIMITED
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial analysis, consultation, and management; investment advice, consultation, and management; management of mutual funds and investment funds; financial advice; financing services; currency exchange and advice; issuing of letters of credit; electronic funds transfer; providing information in the fields of banking to United States customers of foreign banks and insurance companies | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA LIMITEED
- Other trademarks owned by THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA; LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by THE STANDARD BANK OF SOUTH AFRICA; LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named SBG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2019 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2019 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2019 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 18, 2014 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 29, 2013 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 5, 2013 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2013 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 6, 2012 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 19, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 25, 2010 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 28, 2009 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 18, 2009 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2009 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |