Drawing for LONGLINE

USPTO serial 79069683

LONGLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LONGLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Optical fibres and cables made from optical fibres; hardware and hardware accessories, all the aforesaid goods exclusively for use in the telecommunications industrySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2019DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Dec 20, 2019DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 21, 2019CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Dec 14, 2018CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 13, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2011FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2011FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2011FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Dec 25, 2010OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 9, 2010OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2010OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 31, 2010MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 31, 2010ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2009RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 2, 2009RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 2, 2009RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 2, 2009RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 1, 2009CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 14, 2009MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 10, 2009NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2009REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance